On Going to College
Our
Debt to College
During my senior year, I struggled with the
decision to attend a university; I had many discussions on the benefits and
downfalls of attending college. In the end, I came to the conclusion that it is
most important to attend a college for the sake of learning, and it is equally
important to know what it is you desire to learn before enrolling.
Most people attend college under the premise that they
are seeking a higher paying job. Statistics suggest that the average
graduate earns entry level wages that are about ten
dollars above the minimum wage.
However,
what these statistics do not account for is the
amount of time it will take to pay off accrued college debt,
the deceleration of these entry level wages, and the extremely competitive job
market. If anything, the number of people going to university because of this
ideology has rendered it obsolete. A degree has gone from an advantage into a requirement in the workforce,
and if everyone owns a degree, one needs even more to set himself apart from
his competitors.
These monetary and occupational
setbacks are aggravated by the fact that a
lot of people enroll without knowing what they plan on studying.
Many of the arguments I heard in defense of this detractor are that very few
people know what they want to do at the start of their college career, that it
is not important to solidify your choice until your junior year, and that
many people end up changing their majors anyway.
While
these are all true, I do not feel they justify the amount of money one has to
spend in hopes she will “figure it out later”; in actuality, the idea that these teenagers who
lack surety about the prospect of their future yet who are expected to be
fiscally mature enough to make major decisions based off these uncertainties is
absurd.
Even
more to the point on this indecision is that the people who simply choose a
major and get a degree for the sake of the job market generally are not
invested in their education. They complete courses with the goal of earning
credits rather than concern for the information. Their mind focuses on passing
instead of learning, which in the end leads to less qualified and less knowledgeable
people in the workforce.
On
the other hand, someone who is confident in their chosen area of interest is
more likely to excel; instead of simply focusing on the future benefits, the
student’s attention is centered around studying about the topic itself. They
are more likely to retain information and in the end do better in their area of
occupation.
One
has to realize that universities were initially only focused on learning;
improving one’s self through higher levels of education was the sole goal.
Therefore, it makes sense that those who have a desired area of study do better
than those who go to college because they were told it is the smart thing to
do; the former reflects better the initial universities, which were the
foundation upon which all current universities’ atmospheres are built. This focus on passing instead of
learning has led to a concerning amount of grade
inflation in recent years,
likely influenced by government incentives colleges get for passing students
quickly within a four year program.
This
is not to say we should fault those who are concerned with security for their
future; however, it is to say that perhaps we should veer away from this
obsession with numerical values and statistics and instead focus first most on
purposefulness and whether, when it comes to high level education, function
meets our needs.
In
the end, this approach would benefit us all: a lower standard of requirement in
the workforce, fewer unqualified people in the workforce, a more serious
community of students in universities, and, most importantly, less money wasted
by people who have not really considered what college is truly for.




.png)
Comments
Post a Comment